Shadowing Cinema: Raymond Cauchetier, the Photographer of the French New Wave

La Nouvelle Vague proved that there were other paths than those followed by the traditional cinema of the time, and created a new language of film. It broke with cinematic conventions, showing that everything could be questioned, as had already happened with Italian neo-realism before the War. From 1959 to 1969, Raymond Cauchetier was the set-photographer on some of the most important films of the French New Wave. His images captured the invention of a new kind of cinema, with films like À bout de souffle, Une femme est une femme and Jules et Jim; they are historic records in their own right, some of the greatest and most revealing photographic documents ever made of films in progress as they illustrated the revolutionary movement as it happened, on set and on screen.
 
Anna Karina by Raymond Cauchetier

Anna Karina, “Une femme est une femme”, 1960, directed by Jean-Luc Godard

 

A series that brings together two worlds I love:
cinema and photography. Shadowing Cinema is about
the unit still photographer: the one who documents everything
that happens on and behind the screen, the one who can capture
the essence of an entire movie in one shot.

 
 
“I am a reporter, not an artist. I believe that reportage teaches us more – it’s more important to capture life than constructed situations.”

To this day, Raymond Cauchetier still lives in Paris, in the same apartment where he was born in 1920, having returned there after spending his life under different skies. The first time he left Paris was on a bicycle, in 1940, fleeing the Nazi occupation. In 1943, he became involved with the Corps Franc Pommiès, a large resistance group in southwest France which took part in the 1944 Liberation. After serving in the Third Algerian Infantry Division and travelling to the French Africa, he was eventually sent to the French-Indochina war in the 1950s as part of the press unit of the French Air Force. It was there, in Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos, where he learned photography as an autodidact, after having been suggested by a superior that he should look for a photographer in the units who might be able to put together a photo album for air service personnel. He appointed himself, bought a Rolleiflex, the camera used in Indochina by all the war correspondents at the time, and started to take pictures of everything he saw around.
 
Jules et Jim by Raymond Cauchetier

“Jules et Jim”, 1962, directed by François Truffaut

 
Jules et Jim Raymond Cauchetier photography

François Truffaut and Jeanne Moreau on the set of “Jules et Jim”

 
His experience in the war no doubt contributed to Cauchetier’s photojournalistic eye that he would later imploy on the movie set when he returned to Paris. His fast-paced, up-close, unstudied style fit perfectly with the New Wave method of hastily assembled scenes, spare intimate moments, and unconstrained filming in the street. A “reporter” photographic style that was far removed from standard set photography and which Cauchetier confessed that he was severely criticized for at the time.

“At the time, set photographers were technicians with ill-defined jobs. They were mostly asked to take a photo from the spot where the movie camera was standing at the end of a scene, and then to make themselves scarce. They got in everyone’s way and cost the producers money as every minute had to be used profitably. Their role as button-pushers brought them a meagre salary that was aligned with that of junior machine operators. Besides, nobody really knew what to do with the photos, which only really interested the script girl trying to get the continuity right. As for my pictures, which belonged to the production company, they stayed in boxes for fifty years,” Cauchetier explained.
 
A bout de soufflé Raymond Cauchetier

Jean Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg on Champs-Élysées during the filming of “À bout de souffle”, 1959,
directed by Jean-Luc Godard

 
Jean Seberg in Breathless

Jean Seberg filming “À bout de souffle”, Hotel de Suede, Paris, 1959

 
Fortunately, the unit photographer’s contribution, and in particular Raymond Cauchetier’s, to the world of cinema has now been given the credit it deserves. As a great unit photographer often does, Cauchetier could capture the essence of an entire film in a shot. During the filming of Breathless, Cauchetier created enduring moments that Godard’s shoot only implied. There is a scene on the Champs-Élysées, filmed in long shot and from overhead, in which Godard has Seberg give Belmondo a sweet peck on the cheek. Cauchetier brought the actors together to reproduce the scene in a close-up, which became one of the movie’s iconic images despite not existing in the film at all. Cauchetier caught the film’s immediacy and free-form style, as well as the star power, ease and effervescence of Seberg and Belmondo throughout the shoot.
 
Jean Luc Godard by Raymond Cauchetier


Jean-Luc Godard and cameraman Raoul Coutard on the set of “Une femme est une femme”, Rue Lafayette, Paris

 
But it is François Truffaut, my favourite New Wave director, whom Cauchetier speaks most highly of in his self-portrait. There he is in the image below, filming the opening establishing shot from Baisers volés (1968). The Eiffel Tower is a recurring image in Truffaut’s films. In 1957 he was even assigned to direct a short film about a man who can see the Eiffel Tower but can not get to it – this was the inspiration for the opening titles of Les quatre cents coups (The 400 Blows), 1959. On several of his films, Truffaut worked with legendary New Wave cameraman Raoul Coutard, who also shot many of Godard’s reply films. There is a photo of the two of them (the third one below) captured by Cauchetier while filming Antoine et Colette. Truffaut and Coutard always worked quickly with available daylight to get as many set-ups per day as possible. Antoine et Colette was finished in a week. Cauchetier had the ability to catch the innovative techniques, frenetic pace and the exuberance of the actors and crew working on the movies that came to define an era.
 
François Truffaut by Raymond Cauchetier

François Truffaut with the camera crew on the set of “Baiser volés” (“Stolen Kisses”), 1968, Paris

 
François Truffaut by Raymond Cauchetier

François Truffaut gives a cigarette to an extra dressed during the filming of “Baisers volés”, 1968

 
François Truffaut on the set of Antoine et Colette

François Truffaut and cameraman Raoul Coutard on the set of “Antoine et Colette”, 1962

 
Cauchetier also worked with another great French director, Jacques Demy, who appeared in the wake of La Nouvelle Vague, but he stood out from his fellow New Wavers. Mostly uninterested in the formal experimentation that define many of his contemporaries, he distilled his filmmaking style through romantic and deeply emotional storytelling, dispelling the notion that cinema had to be lifelike. Usually known for his colourful movies, which were as open to tragedy as to comedy, Jacques Demy soberly filmed La baie des anges (Bay of Angels), 1963, in black and white. “I wanted to lay bare the workings of a passion,” said the director about the film that has Jeanne Moreau play Jackie, a compulsive gambler who pursues the goal of a doomed and reckless passion. It is a film that stands apart, not in the least because of its aesthetic and style and because of Jeanne Moreau as a vision all cladded in white. Cauchetier’s still photographs are proof of that.
 
Jeanne Moreau Bay of Angels

Jeanne Moreau and Claude Mann in “La baie des anges”, 1963, directed by Jacques Demy

La baie des anges Raymond Cauchetier

Jeanne Moreau, “La baie des anges”, 1963

 
Anouk Aimee Lola by Raymond Cauchetier

Anouk Aimée in “Lola”, 1961, Nantes, directed by Jacques Demy

 
A few years back, a book about the photographer of the French Hew Wave was published. Raymond Cauchetier’s New Wave provides a comprehensive look at the photographer’s influence, garnering him much deserved recognition for his role in creating the aesthetic of the Nouvelle Vague.
 
Jean Luc Godard and Anna Karina by Raymond Cauchetier

Jean-Luc Godard and Anna Karina, on the set of “Une femme est une femme”, 1960

 
La Peau Douce Raymond Cauchetier photography

François Truffaut and Françoise Dorléac on the set of “La peau doua e”, 1964, Rambouillet,
directed by François Truffaut

 
Related content: Behind the Hollywood Scenes: Bob Willoughby / Shadowing Cinema: François Duhamel / One Day That Summer:Shirley MacLaine on the Set of Can Can
 
Still unit photographers
 
photos: Raymond Cauchetier | James Hyman Gallery

Posted by classiq in Film, Photography | | Comments Off on Shadowing Cinema: Raymond Cauchetier, the Photographer of the French New Wave

Alex Beard: Making Art and Creating Awareness

Exotic creatures like elephants, giraffes, rhinos and sailfish are drawn out by artist Alex Beard’s hand into colourful, whimsical, fantastic landscapes. Some of them are interacting with the street scenes of New Orleans, Alex’s residing city, taking the form of children’s illustrations – these are among my favourites. Not just as art pieces in their own right, but because their purpose is to encourage children to embrace creativity in their own lives and to educate kids about the importance of preserving the Earth’s wilderness and saving endangered wildlife. It is about making art that is accessible to and that has meaning for the widest possible audience. This is the beauty and power of art.

Alex Beard’s entire body of work concerns raising awareness and preserving the world’s most jeopardized species. His Watering Hole Foundation is dedicated to help save endangered wildlife and to preserve the Earth’s remaining wilderness, and supports antipoaching measures in Northern Kenya and other conservation efforts.
 
Alex Beard On the Ngare Ndare River

On the Ngare Ndare River

 
Raised in New York City in a family that fostered philanthropy, creativity and exploration (he is the son of a philanthropist father and a magazine editor mother, and the nephew of renowned wildlife photographer Peter Beard), Alex Beard has travelled extensively around the world from early on, which profoundly influenced his work. He graduated from Tufts University and attended the School of the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston and The New Orleans Academy of Fine Arts, where he honed a distinctive painting technique that he has coined “abstract naturalism” – a vivid, elaborate style influenced by both the natural world and abstract expressionism that has become his signature mark, landing his work in public and private collections and in solo exhibitions in New York, Los Angeles, New Orleans and Hong Kong.

Artists are conveyors of the times that they live in, people that express the times that they live in. They have something to say that is a statement of the world today, of society today. Alex Beard is one of them. I had the great pleasure to talk with Alex about the importance of exposing children to art, about his social responsibility as both a human being and an artist, and about his fondest memories from Kenya (like drinking Tuskers with his friends as a teenager beneath the tree where Denys Finch Hatton was buried on the Ngong Hills). Honest and inspiring. Thank you, Alex!
 
 

“I believe that it is my duty as a human being to be a
responsible tenant of the natural world. As an artist,
I have certain tools to help accomplish that goal.”

 
 
Alex, I am particularly fond of your children’s art prints. As a parent to a toddler, I would like to ask you: What is your philosophy on exposing kids to the arts at a young age?

​There is no age too young to expose children to art!

Your unique, intricate wildlife paintings seem to reflect both your love of nature and your concern with the preservation of the flora and fauna of our natural surroundings and with the conservation of the world’s most jeopardized wilds. Do you believe it is your duty, as an artist, to effect change?

​I believe that it is my duty as a human being to be a responsible tenant of the natural world. As an artist, I have certain tools to help accomplish that goal, therefore not using the talents at my dispoal for greater good is both irresponsible and selfish.

You make art to create awareness. How can every individual impact change?

​All activism is local; politics, environmentalism, civic responsiblity, and charity. So everyone can effect change by taking care of their own little piece of the planet.
 

Alex Beard The Uptown Streetcar

The Uptown Streetcar

 
Alex Beard artwork

left: Gestural Bird I | right: Stack of Beasts II

 

How has your up-bringing in New York, moving to New Orleans and extensive travelling around the globe influenced you creatively?

​Travel and exposure to other cultures and peoples have influenced me to think beyond my own narrow lens.

Who and what inspires you?

​Nature and those that you find in it.

Given your lineage, was it difficult to find your own voice in the artistic world?

​Yes.

What was the galvanizing moment that made you realise you had your own story to tell in your very own way?

There was no single galvanizing moment, but rather a slow erosion of ego. It’s hard work trying to be someone or something other than who you are naturally yourself, so exhaustion had a part to play in it, too. Ultimately, I just stopped worrying about what and who I wasn’t, and all (or at least most) of the narcissistic angst went away. Phew.
 

Alex Beard Crossing the Mara

Crossing the Mara

 

What is the most valuable lesson that Africa has taught you?

​Africa offers a glimpse at the timelessness of the natural world, its enormity, and my insignificant yet impactful part in it.

A travel writer once told me that the most fulfilling thing about her work is being able to change the false impression that somebody has on a country and its people. Did you leave with any prejudices to Africa? If so, how has your experience there changed that?

​I first went to Africa with a clean slate because I was too young to have any prejudice as to who or what I might find. In general, I find prejudice unhelpful, small-minded, and, if possible, to be avoided at all costs. Nonetheless prejudice is an easy track which leads to complacentcy, proventiality, and an acute myopic view of the world, one which is ultimately unsatisfying, uninteresting, and dangerous. As to changing people’s false impressions, I am an advocate for everyone to go as far afield as they can to see for themselves. It is a universal vaccine for narrowmindedness.
 

Audience Portrait II Alex Beard

Audience Portrait, II

 

The first project of your Watering Hole Foundation was centered on protecting the Wild African Elephant in Northern Kenya. Are the efforts of the foundation visible? What has been the most challenging part of this project?

​Elephant poaching in Northern Kenya has plummeted over the last three years. The Watering Hole Foundation’s efforts are but a small piece in a much bigger puzzle. The most challenging part of any conservation project is the fludity of the situation on the ground and the needs of the community to best protect their local environment. With that in mind, The Watering Hole Foundation is happy with the relationships cultivated over the last five years and looks forward to continuing the fight to preserve Northern Kenya’s wilderness.
​
What is your most beautiful memory of Kenya?

​I have different memories from different ages.
​- Drinking Tuskers with my friends beneath the tree where Denys Finch-Hatton was buried on the Ngong Hills as a teenager
​- Particularly good elephant charge in my early twenties
​- Lions in my camp
​- Bringing my son on camel safari
​- Carrying my young daughter on my shoulders tracking elephants on foot
 

Alex Beard Dreaming of Africa

Dreaming of Africa

 

​You have also written a trilogy of storybooks, Tales from the Watering Hole. Could you tell me what they are about?

​Tales from the Watering Hole are anthropomorphic parables in the vein of Aesop and Kipling. The Jungle Grapevine is about rumors, Monkey See, Monkey Draw is a book about the fun of making art for little kids, and Crocodile’s Tears is a story about endangered species and the environment, and coming in September, the fourth book is called The Lying King and it is about a warthog.

One favourite thing to do in New Orleans and which you would miss if you lived anywhere else in the world:

​Eating crawfish with your neighbors – standing in your garden around a table covered in the local newspaper, stacked with mudbugs, and shooting the bull.

One thing you wish people appreciated more:
​
​I wish people appreciated how thin the vinear is between light and dark, order and chaos, civillization and brutality.
 

Crossing the Elephant Highway Alex Beard

Crossing The Elephant Highway

 
Gestural Elephant 2017 Alex Beard

Gestural Elephant 2017

 

Website: alexbeardstudio.com | Drawing the Line, a documentary by Alex Beard
Facebook: @AlexBeardStudioNOLA
Instagram: @alexbeardstudio

 
Crocodile's Tears Alex Beard
photos: courtesy of Alex Beard

Posted by classiq in Art, Books, Children’s illustration, Interviews | | 1 Comment

My Favourite Films of 2017 (Part II)

No Oscars talk this year, no Oscars watching, no Oscars coverage. I would rather talk about my personal favourite films of last year. This is part two, as I shared a few other preferences last November (although I am sure there are still many worthy movies I have not yet had the chance to watch).

But first, I would like to take something out of the way. Lady Bird is one of the films of 2017 I was most looking forward to. But it did not reach my expectations. It’s a good coming-of-age film, but I didn’t find the story that original, nor Greta Gerwig’s directorial debut extraordinary or Saoirse Ronan’s performance her best. The praise for this movie is really overboard. The film industry has suddenly become so concerned with genre diversity, feminine rights and all sorts of discrimination issues that what is politically correct has become much more important than talent and artistic expression.
 
Phantom Thread

“Phantom Thread” | Annapurna Pictures

 
Two of my readers have recently made remarks about my cynicism and outspoken writing when it comes to this kind of subjects. One of them was not reproachful, just a stating of facts. But the other one was. I always appreciate the feedback from my readers and I am motivated by our conversations, and as much as I want this to be a positive platform where I can share only things that inspire me creatively and in the way I live my life, I can not block out my disapproval and even criticism of certain things.

And let me make myself clear. I do not criticise artists and films. I don’t review movies, and I certainly do not review movies I don’t like. I am not a film critic and I wouldn’t want to be one. I love movies too much. I like to talk (endlessly) about movies, and especially about movies that I love. But everything that is happening in the media regarding the film industry long ago stopped being objective. And let me tell you something else. It was also long ago that I took the decision to separate the artist from the person. I do not believe an artist’s work should be censored in any way based solely on his/her private behaviour and life. The discussion is long and I respect both pro and against opinions. But the hypocrisy of Hollywood and the manipulation of information has reached such high levels that taking everything that is said in the press for granted is nothing less than stupidity.

Therefore, I just can not keep sharing good-vibe things with you while ignoring the ugly that’s lying under Hollywood’s sudden call for equality and etiquette. Even if I have chosen not to succumb to the news in the media, that doesn’t mean I am not paying attention. And I don’t like what I see. I don’t want to generalize, but at a time when outrage and diatribe are substitutes for analysis, this looks more like shameless opportunism from the part of some and of certain movements who exploit the social networks frenzy in order to look good and render justice expeditiously.

So, yes, I think it is my duty to express my point of view quite frankly. Culture is one of the most precious things a person can have. I do not like it to serve any interest but people’s own interest. Don’t let the media and social media do the thinking for you. Watch movies with an open mind. Think by yourself.
 
The Other Side of Hope 2017

“The Other Side of Hope” | Sputnik, Oy Bufo Ab, Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen

 

The Other Side of Hope (Finland)
Director: Aki Kaurismäki

Regretfully, this is the first film by Aki Kaurismäki that I have seen. But I don’t think I’m wrong when I say that his is an unmistakable filmmaking style. Minimalistic production design, straight-faced narration, wry humour. The Other Side of Hope is both a tragedy and a comedy. It is about the Syrian refugee crisis and immigration, but it is placed in Finland, a background that proves much more resourceful in the hands of a talented filmmaker. Because this film is ultimately a declaration of faith in people. Social criticism is suffused with humanity and empathy. It is a clear-eyed response to one of the most stringent current global issues and the film’s message can reach and touch a far wider audience than a harsh documentary ever could. Yes, this is the power of cinema.

Kaurismäki’s approach to the subject much reminds me about John Cassavetes, who in the book Cassavetes on Cassavetes said: “We must take a more positive stand in making motion pictures, and have a few more laughs, and treat life with a little more hope. […] I believe in people. […] Is life about horror? Or is it about those few moments we have? I would like to say that my life has some meaning.”
 
Three Billboards outside Ebbing Missouri

“Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri” | Blueprint Pictures, Film 4, Fox Searchlight Pictures

 
Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri (UK/USA)
Director: Martin McDonagh

Sometimes the reality is this: faced with unimaginable loss and injustice, you want to take things in your own hands. You want to make your own justice. It happens in real life. I am asking you, the reader, to take these words as a fully discerning person. And it requires the same discerning quality, and empathy when none would seem deserved, to truly appreciate this film. It is a rough meditation on the true nature of loss, grief and vengeance. Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri is a bleak, fearlessly unapologetic, pitch-black comedy. It is superbly acted and McDonagh’s incendiary, often hilarious screenplay plays beautifully on Frances McDormand — her monologue to a local priest is worth a round of applause alone. Sam Rockwell’s Dixon’s arc is remarkable, seemingly-impossible yet completely plausible, and Woody Harrelson delivers the kind of understated performance that unfortunately so often goes unrewarded to the benefit of showy and transformative roles. This film surprises until the very end and there’s nothing I love more when watching a movie.

And there is one more thing: I am asking you to disregard all the accolades this film has won this awards season. They have started to work against it because we are so used to seeing the less worthy films gain undeserved recognition that you might fall in the trap of putting Three Billboards in that category. It’s way above it. I have read criticism towards McDormand, her role being belittled because her character is racist, violent, a bad example. I honestly could not believe I was actually reading those words. Where is this going? We should simply disregard or ban all the films and characters in the history of cinema that are not politically correct? Where is the artistic expression? Where is the freedom of expression, period? I am sorry, but these arguments are plain bullshit.
 
Detroit 2017 Kathryn Bigelow

“Detroit” | Annapurna Pictures

 
Detroit (USA)
Director: Kathryn Bigelow

Detroit is a film that recreates one of the darkest chapters in the American history. Kathryn Bigelow delivers her usual clean, raw, pertinent, scrutinizing, unsentimental look at the 1967 Detroit street riots and the Algiers Motel Incident that resulted in the deaths of three black men at the hands of white police officers, later tried and acquitted. I want to stress out the documentary-like intimacy quality of this film. It’s unpredictable, it feels real, it’s like a shot of what the participants to the Algiers Motel Incident felt. But I think the most important thing to take away from Bigelow’s latest picture is not the emotional experience (and I assure you it is a strong experience which leaves you shocked and outraged and which provokes reflection and reactions), but the fact that these are historical facts. This did happen, and, what’s even worse, this is still very much part of the cruel reality in America.

Forget about Get Out (I do not understand the hype about that film). This is the movie every American should see. “This is America” reads on the poster of Detroit. Unfortunately for the entire world, so it is. Why this film is so great is because it informs and urges to dialogue and maybe even to change.
 
Afterimage Andrezj Wajda

“Afterimage” | Akson Studio

 
Afterimage (Poland)
Director: Andrzej Wajda

Afterimage premiered in fact in 2016 at the Toronto Film Festival, but it was released in cinemas in 2017, so I will include it here. Especially that it’s such a good film. Isn’t it amazing how Andrezj Wajda made his debut with a great film, A Generation, and ended it with another great movie, Afterimage?

Boguslaw Linda plays Wladyslaw Strzeminski, Poland’s most renowned painter, who was also a theoretician. The film begins with a witty, visually arresting scene, showing Strzeminski in his apartment about to paint when his white canvas, then the whole room, suddenly turns red. A giant banner celebrating Stalin has been hanged in front of his window. He rips a hole in it with one of his crutches (he has lost an arm and a leg in World War I) to let in the daylight, committing an infraction that’s only the beginning of his troubles with authority. This single sequence brilliantly sets the tone for the entire film, a grim, clear-eyed portrayal of the predations of Stalinism, as well as a vivid, passionate look at the importance of the autonomity of the artist, of art as an individual way of seeing rather than a reproduction of a collectively agreed-upon reality.
 
Phantom Thread

“Phantom Thread” | Annapurna Pictures

 
Phantom Thread (USA)
Director: Paul Thomas Anderson

This is a film created out of sheer love of cinema and storytelling. In a time when there is so much pressure to make socially- or politically-charged movies, it feels truly wonderful to watch a great film that captures your imagination, that captures your interest through its own story and through its characters alone, without any ulterior motives or messages. I admire Paul Thomas Anderson for keeping it in the artistic field and for doing such a fine job at it.

Phantom Thread is a classic, it is beautiful to look at, absorbing, thrilling, mysterious, a little dark, with a Hitchcockian vibe but retaining its own originality, with touches of humour and black humour. It’s about dedication, perfectionism, love, co-dependency, obsession. It makes you keep asking questions and the answers it does provide (because it does not answer all the questions it raises and that’s part of its fascinating beauty) take you by surprise. And those final moments and lines are the kind of open ending that so often make a film great. Because everyone interprets it in its own way. I wrote much more in detail about Phantom Thread here.
 

Posted by classiq in Film | Comments Off on My Favourite Films of 2017 (Part II)

Talking Books and the Art of Bookshop Keeping with Vlad Niculescu


 

On any given Saturday spent in town, you will find me in a bookshop. It is my family’s favourite weekend activity – my latest partner in this activity is our almost three-year-old son. He is out the door when he hears that we’re off to the bookstore just as he is when he hears that we’re going to the park to play football. For me, there is no way you can have one without the other, sports and books, in a child’s education, or in any adult’s life for that matter.

We all need bookstores. We do. And I am not talking just about the books we can discover there, and about the power and magic of books – that they can transform lives, especially young lives, that they develop a child’s imagination like nothing else can, that the sense of discovery you experience in a bookshop can never compete with buying something online, that bookstores are the best champions of new and emerging writers. I am also talking about the bookshop and bookshop owner/keeper as being crucial for our inherent need for human contact in a world going increasingly icy and artificial. We need the comforting optimism of a bookshop, especially a favourite bookshop, full of stories waiting to be discovered precisely when the world feels distant and uncertain, we need the social interaction and warmth the bookshop invites to and provides. We need bookshops to feel human.
 
Carturesti & Friends - Classiq 
Personally, I can’t read an e-book and I don’t get why anyone would choose to read words on a stark screen, instead of turning the pages of a beautiful book, especially when we already spend so many hours each day staring at monitors and phones. But I am well aware that, in these times, this is a reasoning that will simply not hold for many. So I have turned to the one person I know who can make the best argument for the importance and beauty of paper books and for keeping the art of bookstore keeping alive: Vlad Niculescu.

Vlad is the former owner of the English bookshop Anthony Frost, which, for almost ten years, was a reference cultural spot on the Bucharest map (for locals and tourists alike) and which was included in Bob Eckstein’s Footnotes from the World’s Greatest Bookstores. Unfortunately (and I think I am speaking from the point of view of every book and culture lover in this city), Anthony Frost had to close its doors in March 2017, but we found hope again when we discovered Vlad Niculescu and Anthony Frost in a new formula, as Cărturești & friends, at the end of last year. In our recent interview, Vlad shares his honest opinion about the challenge to survive of the traditional bookshop, he talks about that special childhood moment that sparked his imagination and love affair with books, and makes the case for the beautiful book cover.
 
 

“What I know for sure is that reading,
especially fiction, is an activity that must be
exercised daily, just like physical exercising,
otherwise we go numb.”

 
 
How has your passion for books started?

Slowly. Of course it helped that I was born in a house that had a library, a house where I saw everyone around me, from my parents and grandparents to my big sister, with a book in their hands from time to time, but until I was nine I wanted nothing else to do but play (which somehow hasn’t changed at all) – play the ball in the courtyard or in the street with the other children. I „was assassinating” my father with „Let’s play” every evening when he came home from work. My mother, in turn, „was assassinating” me with the reading. There are assassinations caused by too much love, so this thing of being forced to read was a very risky „game”. I think it was a sort of a small miracle – thanks to my father again – that helped me a lot in this regard: a French comics magazine that had an impressive circulation in those times and which was available in Romania as well because it was distributed by L’Humanite: Pif. Thanks to it, I entered a universe of endless imagination and, since then, reading became my favourite game.

And your love for books slowly lead to your opening the English bookstore Anthony Frost in downtown Bucharest, which you kept for almost ten years. I thank you for that. Now we can find you here at Cărturești & friends in a new formula, but already rediscovering the wonderful atmosphere and unique selection of books that had made Anthony Frost my favourite bookshop in town – because I always came for the good books as well as for the warm atmosphere. It truly feels like a revival of the art of bookshop keeping. What’s the biggest challenge right now?

Surviving. The public for our largely atypical selection of books is rather small. I am very grateful for the loyalty of this community that has been built in years. As long as they need us and stand by us, we will be here for them too.
 
Talking books and the art of bookshop keeping  

Why do you say atypical? I personally find your selection in perfect tune with my own tastes and interests, and, according to my standard, this should be the norm when it comes to the kind of bookstores I look for. But I do realise I’m in the minority. So my question truly comes from sheer concern about the values of our society: why has the level of culture sunken so much? (I am particularly speaking about Romania, of course, although, really, I see it as a general problem, more or less so in different parts of the world).

Atypical for the times we are living, yes. There is a decline of the interest in the traditional bookshop that takes different forms worldwide (ten years ago, for example, there were 10-12 bookshops and antique bookstores in Charing Cross in London; today there is only the Foyles flagship store), but which has mainly the same causes, well-known – there is no use in mentioning them here – or in the process of being discovered. However, as I was saying above, this interest could be rekindled, even during these trying times, through fostering a good relationship with an intellectually alive local community. I don’t believe, however, that things will ever be the same again. If we want to survive, as I was saying, we have to adapt. I think the use of technology (in harmony with the canons of the traditional bookshop) plays a very important role in this education.

Do you have favourite writers, favourite books? Do you bring them to the store? Is it important to separate your own tastes from the public’s or is it a good bookshop keeper’s duty and responsibility to try to distill the public’s taste, to educate the customers a little? How do you make the selection of books to bring to the store?

Of course I have favourite writers, books I keep returning to and books I’ve always wanted to have in the bookshop. I have found out about many others all these years that I have spent among people and books. How can you make a bookstore survive being aware of the responsibility mentioned above – without taking yourself too seriously – in these times? How can you make a selection that is able to meet these goals? I don’t know a perfect answer that works in every part of the world, but what I do know is that I couldn’t stay in a bookshop that would not invite me to take home its entire selection of books and I also know I could never recommend a book I don’t believe in.

Would you mind sharing a book you keep coming back to?
The Third Policeman – Flann O’Brien
 
Interview Vlad Niculescu Carturesti & Friends  
Who is the latest great new writer you have discovered?

We discover or rediscover authors every day. I have recenly read an interview with Philip Roth at his 85th anniversary. The thing I liked the most about it was that he talked about what I myself love about reading: you enter telescopically through a book that leads you to the next one, taking you from the world of a writer to another’s, because a name you find in the first book sends you in search of the next book and so on. One of the names he mentions in the interview is also one of the most important discoveries I have made in the past years: Ta-Nehisi Coates, whose „Between the World and Me” was fortunately translated in Romanian, too, by the Black Button Books publishing house as „Intre lume si mine”. Another recent discovery would be Teju Cole. They are two important voices, with a powerful, blunt writing style. I have recently read Jeremy Gavron, whose inventiveness reminded me of Borges or Mircea Horia Simionescu.

Yes, I have read that interview with Philip Roth as well and it is interesting that you mention Ta-Nehisi Coates and Teju Cole, too. Could you recommend a few other books which have recently been published?

Felix Culpa – Jeremy Gavron

Tenements, Towers & Trash – Julia Wertz

The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone – Olivia Laing

The Correspondence Of Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem – edited by Marie Luise Knott, translated by Anthony David

The Future Is History – Masha Gessen

Arabia Felix: The Danish Expedition of 1761-1767 – Thorkild Hansen, translated by Kathleen & James McFarlane

The Dawn Watch – Maya Jasanoff

Technicians of The Sacred – 50 years anniversary edition, 2017 – An Anthology by Jerome Rothenberg

The Last Testament – Jonas Bendiksen
 
Why we need paper books  
The past couple of years I’ve been less interested in literature and mainly interested in reading books about film, photography, art, history, autobiographies, or travel journals. Where do you think I should start reading fiction again? What three books in the store would you recommend?

It has happened to me too. I don’t think it works if you are telling yourself, or if you are reading in the texts of the people you believe in, that fiction is important because, through it, you can live thousands of lives or because fiction builds empathy, etc. We simply have to search, all the more so if we have distanced ourselves from fiction, and find a text that can be anything – a haiku, a poem, a SF, a collage or a classic novel – that will wake us. I don’t have any other solution. What I know for sure is that – it sounds like a banality, but it never hurts repeating – reading, especially fiction, is an activity that must be exercised daily, just like physical exercising, otherwise we go numb.

Notes of A Crocodile – Qiu Miaojin
Pachinko – Min Jin Lee
In the Heart of the Heart of the Country – William H. Gass

In one of our conversations you brought up the subject of the multitude of great but emotionally-heavy, sad books, and that some customers express their interest in reading more good “happy” books. But could it be that a great book should go beyond entertainment and escapism, that it should challenge you to see more clearly, to seek solutions, to be better, to make you realise that life always comes with good and bad, to have the potential to change your life, and that this kind of book never comes in the form of resolute chipperness?

The lists of the important English language prizes confirm the beginning of our conversation – for example, the latest Booker prize, won by George Saunders with Lincoln In The Bardo – but things are not that simple. I remember an interview with Prof. Dr. Iamandescu who talks about the accelerated rhythm of the activity of the neurons when we listen to baroque music, Bach, Handel, Vivaldi, but also to Mozart or Beethoven. I think the same thing happens, maybe not that prominent, in the case of our reading – it is not necessarily about the genre approached, but about the power of the text. We have no chance as species but through education and culture. I think this is what Rothenberg is talking about in his anthology when he talks about how „poetry can save the world”.

Do customers come to you to ask you for book recommendations? Do you have to read a little into your customer to be able to offer your advice?

If they didn’t, I would be very disappointed – it would mean I don’t do my job right. It helps knowing my customers’ tastes, naturally, but I don’t believe it’s absolutely necessary that I do. My recommendations are always based on the things I myself truly love.

I, for one, appreciate a book with a beautiful cover and design. And I am relieved whenever I hear writers mention the importance of beautiful books. Am I wrong? Does image count? Should we judge a book by its cover?

The book is a perfect object – it can not be reinvented. Like the wheel – as Umberto Eco is saying in the book of conversations with Jean Claude Carriere – „This is Not The End Of The Book”. Doesn’t this perfection often suffer because of the questionable quality of the paper or because of the bad taste of the cover?

It is obvious that you do what you do with your heart. Should people follow their passion and do what they love?

I believe we should learn, for everyone’s benefit and despite social constraints, more and more to identify as early on as possible our individual capacities and to encourage them in every possible way. Yes, it sounds like a beautiful dream, I know. Passion, talent, intelligence have never seemed enough to me though. How each one of us can be of help to others, I think we should understand as soon as possible that “above all is endurance”, as James Baldwin said.

Without independent bookstores, I believe there would be very few great new authors to discover. It happened often that I bought the book that was shelved right next to the one I was actually looking for. What other reasons are there to choose a real bookstore over an online retailer? What do you do to keep the customers’ interest up? And how challenging is it to compete with online sellers?

A good bookshop is the one that discovers books you didn’t even know you were looking for, right? Lively, fresh, with a selection that is not based on search algorithms of the likes you find online – „Customers who bought this item also bought these…”. I don’t like this kind of strategies. Our selection is based on books that range from fundamental works to atypical new titles from various domains, from children’s to academic books. So my answer would be this: the book selection first and foremost, and the way you present it; that’s how we try to keep our customers’ interest up: through our authentic, genuine initiative teamed with our availability to order and bring any title the customer is interested in in the shortest time possible. Furthermore, at Cărturești & friends we have now joined forces with Ramona Chirica – she is curating the gallery Receptor which promotes Romanian illustrators – and with Brewtiful café (ed. note: I can vow for their flat white, one of the best in town).
 
Carturesti & Friends

Carturesti & Friends  
Do people still read books? Do Romanians still read books?

Of course they do – but how much and how they read, that’s a different story. As far as Romania is concerned, it is well known that most of the studies put us on one of the last places in Europe when it comes to cultural intake. The explanations are well known. We also know what should be done, it’s not that difficult to figure out, but as long as there will be nothing more done than singular acts and the volunteering of different types of NGOs, there is not much chance for things to change.

So how exactly can we change that? Or let me put it this way: what can the individual, what can I, for example, or the next person who loves books and appreciates culture, do to change that?

If I knew the answer I would be very happy to tell you, but unfortunately I don’t… But a good start would be to try to be an active participant in the cultural life of the city, thus encouraging the consumption of local culture from very early ages.

Is it important for people to continue reading paper books? Why?

Yes, it is, because it is a different kind of „reading”, much more devoted, focused, immersed, with much better results, as proven by studies made by some of the most prestigious universities, as compared to reading on various devices which draw your attention in a multitude of different directions at once making you lose your concentration. I don’t think it is useful, nor possible, in our age, to give up one or the other. We just have to learn to make them work together.
 
Carturesti & Friends

Carturesti & Friends 

You have a special section in the shop dedicated to children’s books. It’s one of my favourites. Where should a parent start in instilling their child the love for reading? And which are, in your opinion, five of the best children’s books of all time?

It is never too soon to start reading to your children and leading by example is extremely important; it is very true that seeing their parents reading, with books in their hands or surrounded by books will trigger the childrens’ curiosity and prompt them to open a book. I find these „best of…” lists terrifying and restrictive. I don’t like making them. They bring back unpleasant feelings related to school. One of the biggest joys of reading is to discover by yourself. Or to believe you discover by yourself. I am not saying that the regular childhood readings are not important or should not be encouraged: the fairy tales and legends of the world, from Grimm Brothers and Hauf, to Ion Creangă, Perrault, Jules Renaud, Barrie or EB White and many, many others, but I, for one, don’t think it is useful to anyone to make the children read in a particular order what we find appropriate, the texts we find „suitable” for children. I discovered as a teenager or even as an adult some so-called children’s authors or illustrators, whom I love just as much now: Iordan Chimet, with his splendid „An Anthology of Innocence”, Sara Fanelli, Edward Gorey.
 
Children's books 

You wish people appreciated more: Books. And by that I mean to truly appreciate books, which is not measured in online likes for photos of books.

One favourite thing to do in Bucharest and which you would miss if you lived anywhere else in the world: To go to Obor (ed. note: the biggest market in Bucharest).

I am film lover and I have to ask: is there any film adapted from a book that you have enjoyed more than the book itself?

The Third Man (1949), directed by Carol Reed after Graham Greene’s novel.
 
Talking books and the art of bookshop keeping

 

Cărturești & friends: 9, Edgar Quinet Street, Bucharest
Facebook: @CarturestiFandom

 
Photographs: Classiq Journal

Posted by classiq in Books, Interviews | | Comments Off on Talking Books and the Art of Bookshop Keeping with Vlad Niculescu

Phantom Thread

M.R. James’ ghost stories. A Christmas Carol. Beatrix Potter’s The Tailor of Gloucester. A particular moment from Paul Thomas Anderson’s personal life when he was sick in bed and his wife was taking care of him, and his imagination just took over: “Oh, she is looking at me with such care and tenderness… wouldn’t it suit her to keep me sick in this state?” These were all sources of inspiration for Anderson’s Phantom Thread, which he wrote, directed and shot himself. He mentioned all these influences in his interview with Terry Gross on Fresh Air and I happened to listen to the podcast before watching the film (it just arrived in our cinema last week). I usually don’t like to read reviews or interviews about films I haven’t yet seen, but I am glad I did this time. I could sense those influences subtly woven into the story, without playing down the element of surprise.
 
Phantom Thread 2017 
This is a film created out of sheer love of cinema and storytelling. In a time when there is so much pressure to make socially- or politically-charged movies, it feels truly wonderful to watch a great film that captures your imagination, that captures your interest through its own story and through its characters alone, without any ulterior motives or messages. I admire Paul Thomas Anderson for keeping it in the artistic field.

Phantom Thread is a classic, it is beautiful to look at, absorbing, thrilling, mysterious, a little dark, with a Hitchcockian vibe but retaining its own originality, with touches of humour and black humour. It’s about dedication, perfectionism, love, co-dependency, obsession. It makes you keep asking questions and the answers it does provide (because it does not answer all the questions it raises and that’s part of its fascinating beauty) take you by surprise. And those final moments and lines are the kind of open ending that so often make a film great. Because everyone interprets it in its own way.

Anderson also mentions Cristóbal Balenciaga as one of the starting points, the greatest couturier of all times in my opinion. According to costume designer Mark Bridges, everyone involved in the production read the book “The Master of Us All: Balenciaga, His Workrooms, His World” (I wrote about it here) in preparation for the project. I am not surprised that Balenciaga influenced the character of Reynolds Woodcock. Even before watching the film and listening to the interview, the movie stills of Daniel Day-Lewis (as Woodcock) released to the press clearly reminded me of Balenciaga at work.
 
Phantom Thread 
Reynolds Woodcock is a couturier in 1950s London. Woodcock lives for his craft (Paul Thomas Anderson wanted to make a film about the most obsessive of artists, the fashion designer, in his own words) and Daniel Day-Lewis has become Reynolds Woodcock, immersing himself into the role – he is known to go to extreme lengths when preparing for a role – and giving one of his best performances. Could it be possible that this actor’s finesse and craft have yet again reached new heights? I simply wish he doesn’t retire, as he announced he would after this film. Vicky Krieps and Lesley Manville give winning performances, too. The way the stillness and looks of all these three actors speak more than words can is something incredible to watch.

photos: film stills | Annapurna Pictures

Posted by classiq in Film | | Comments Off on Phantom Thread